Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Precision load for m1903a4 Remington?

Aloha!

I've got an a4, it's a family heirloom. Unfortunately, it has been sporterized, and the receiver has been drilled for a modern scope.

I've decided to take it farther in that direction, and have bedded the action in a Boyds benchrest stock and mounted a decent Bushnell Elite scope.

Now, I'm searching for a good load for precision shooting at up to 600 yards.

My research indicates that the 1903 series preferred heavier bullets than M2 ball, and that snipers used 185 gr match ammo whenever possible.

Has anyone out there worked up a load that will hold MOA out of a 1903 at up to 600 yards?

Thanks!

Update:

Yeah, Gregg, it is a shame. The "only" permanent damage is the two holes drilled above the chamber. I have thought about filling those holes and restoring the gun, and may still opt to do that someday. The a4 is a piece of history. Until "someday," though...

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I have two Remington 1903A4's - one with a M84 and another that was a former drill rifle that had the cutoff ground off and then restored. I am mounting a Weaver K until I can find a M73B1 replica or Weaver 330C.

    I would also like to know the answer to your question. My plan was to find the closest production ammo to either the M1 Ball that has a 173 grain, nine-degree boat-tailed projectile designed for aerodynamic efficiency or the Match M71. Sniper Central link for the 30-06 recommends either the Federal Gold Medal Match 168gr or the Federal Premium 150gr.

    I personally do not handload but if you do the guns and ammo link suggests and rates powder and projectiles through an M1 Garand. Those loads have to be close if not better in the 1903A4.

    Recommendations for restoration:

    Temporary filling of the holes would not be a problem with store bought fillers. I had a 1903Mk1 with the same problem and used the filler. Turned out pretty nice, especially if I were to ever refinish the metal. As far as scope mounts, scopes and stocks go - I have been pretty satisfied with Sarco. Their link is provided also. They even offer a repro M84 I highly recommend. I just recieved one for a M1D project and their C-stocks are beautiful. They are just lacking the cartouch markings but are great drop-ins. The Weaver K-series are always cheap on ebay and are almost a dead ringer for the M81 or M82.

    Gibbs is also listed in the links and they are bound to offer their parts for sale, eventually.

    Another option would be CMP for stocks. That link is also included.

    Hope this helps!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    To be honest with you, it's quite a shame what happened to that 1903, they are wonderful rifles. I am the proud owner of a Springfield Armory M1903 A1 made in 1912, in amazing condition, unaltered... and many times it has put purpose built competition rifles to shame. I'm not the type to handload special rounds for one gun, but I've had the best results with Federal Ammunition. My 1903 holds an MOA and "then some" (lol) out to six hundred yards and beyond (standard factory stuff). Find the heaviest bullet you can, and use that... match grade ammunition will be expensive, that's a fact, but it's not necessary to handload shells for it. Too bad they butchered an A4, and not one of the everyday runner A3 models... oh well, at least you are trying to make it into something respectable, and I applaud that. I hate seeing sporterized M1903s. It's just horrible, even when it's done right... it just feels unnatural... Good luck with it.

    Source(s): Avid shooter. M1903/Krag-Jorgensen Fanatic.
  • 1 decade ago

    I would have to somewhat disagree that handloading is not necessary - unless your gun really does like a particular factory load, it will never be as accurate as consistent as individually weighed handloads for a variety of reasons. Its mass produced to work in a variety of guns - some will like it, but some won't! And I find it cheaper to reload my own "match" loads. Also, I haven't found factory loads in the velocity range my tests discovered certain O3's and Garands tend to like..

    The ones I've tested seem to like loads in the 2550-2650fps range. 168-180 grain bullet weights of all kinds. All the factory ammo I've seen is loaded hotter.

    If you're 1-10" twist barrel remains, any bullet 168 to 180gr will do well, and only you can discover exactly which ones your gun likes through testing. I have had good luck with Nosler's (of all kinds), and Hornady A-Max's, and Speer Gold Match BTHP's.

    IMR4064 is a great, consistent powder..

  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    I have an M1 Garand National Match. I replicated the US Match Load by using a 168 gr Sierra Match King HPBT on top of 50 grs of IMR 4895 with WLR primers. It works fabulously out to 600 yards. For 1000 yards I use the 190 gr Sierra (same style), in front of 46.1 grs of the same powder, same primer.

    Hope this helps

    Source(s): 30 years a gunsmith, 40 as a shooter
  • 1 decade ago

    You will find that it is a matter of trial and error. Two identical rifles may shoot the same type of ammo differently.

    What you are asking of your rifle 1 moa at 600 yards may prove a little hard to do with your rifle. A match Springfield with a near perfect bore could possibly shoot that well. But many won't.

    Your most fruitful shooting sessions will be with handloads and match bullets.

  • 5 years ago

    2 cartridges each? ---- No problem.... I keep 4 cartridges in mine.... I also own several defense shotguns.... My situation requires only having one loaded... So I rotate my shotguns every month or two.... The one that's not ready I just unload.... This way the spring wont lose tension over time....

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.