Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Andrew
Lv 5
Andrew asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 years ago

Why do so many people on Y!A think China is a communist country?

Yes the ruling party call themselves communist, but that's just historical. It is very clearly and obviously a bullish, no-holds-barred capitalist economy, almost entirely market-driven. Just go to Shanghai or Hong Kong - you can't miss it.

To be communist...

* The government (the "people") should own the means of production. True in China? No.

* The government should manage all labour and its rewards ("from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"). True in China? No.

* Market forces should have no impact on management of the economy. True in China? No.

* There should be a concerted move towards collectivism in all fields. In China? Moving away towards a classic capitalist model.

Certainly there are some socialist concepts in their government model, but that is true of many of the private-enterprise, market-driven economies of Europe as well. I know thre are a few strange people who would call them communist too, but they are people who don't own dictionaries - and have zero understanding of economics.

So... why do people keep calling China communist? Don't get it.

Update:

@Gorilla Glue... a fair enough point, but is it really possible to put the toothpaste back in the tube? I would suggest not. Think about the collapse in foreign trade that would follow the effective nationalisation of the capitalist powerhouses. No ruling party likes to find itself suddenly with the same outgoings but no money coming in. Truth is they are more likely to morph into a kind of fascism than communism - though of course they would CALL it communism!

@Taylor. Their social policies are certainly statist in many areas. But you have to grant me that you cannot have communism without a communist economic model (from each... to each... is the core of communism). What we are looking at is a *socialist* attitude to social policy. That's not communism, that is socialism, which you can have with any economic model within reason.

Update 2:

@Steve: I didn't say it wasn't totalitarian. It is. I said it wasn't communist.

@Curtis... Well they do not have a controlling interest in all companies operating in China, they have a stake in many, and in NEARLY all domestic companies. What's more, this is trending downwards. Won't wash, mate, though a good shot.

As for the control of labour and rewards... it is not the government but economic circumstances that are sending folk to the cities - as has been true in every economically powerful country for a long, long time.

State control of the internal economy is shrinking steadily - as it must, with such a robust private sector, and you can see the effects of the market in their recent reverses. As for the government doing well out of exports. Of course. All totalitarian governments manage to extract funds from all aspects of the economy and this one is no different. Again, I don't say they are not totalitarian, they are just not communist.

As for the w

Update 3:

Try again. As for the world domination stuff... if you are right, then they have already lost - the capitalist infection already runs too deep there.

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    "The government (the "people") should own the means of production. True in China? No." Actually, the government owns controlling interest in all companies operating in China.

    "The government should manage all labour and its rewards ("from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"). True in China? No." It does indeed control labor and it's "rewards". It has been forcing men from the country to the city for the last two decades. As for the rewards, there are few, and the government has absolute say in that because they control the living and working conditions.

    "Market forces should have no impact on management of the economy. True in China? No." You are right, but we are talking about companies that produce products for the rest of the world. Within China, they control everything. And yes, they favor the companies that are making products for the west, but then the government gets a huge chunk of that money.

    "There should be a concerted move towards collectivism in all fields. In China? Moving away towards a classic capitalist model." China is using the ability to cheaply produce things the west wants, to destroy capitalism.

  • ?
    Lv 5
    8 years ago

    There is not and has never been a true communist state. There have been dictatorships that called themselves communist.

    If you have ever been to an "open' meeting, you know why true communism can't work. A horde of people with completely different viewpoints all haggle and then go home leaving the main matter still in chaos.

    In those states calling themselves communist, there is a central committee which dominates the Party and basically decides on the membership.

  • Steve
    Lv 5
    8 years ago

    It is still heavily state controlled centralized planning.

    They have no freedoms of speech or assembly and run their people like the Soviets did a gulag camp.

    Their best athletes are taken from their families at a young age and become subjects of the state.

    They are still very much like the Soviet Union. Just a better run system due in part by letting successful companies come to China to put their slaves to work.

  • meg
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    The government in China still owns most of the means of production through state run corporations, they just sound like the ones we have in the west. see list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Government-o...

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    While their economy certainly as aspects of capitalism, it's their social policies that reek of Communism.

    There's more to a ideology than just it's economic principles

  • 8 years ago

    The argument you make, all the elements you present, are true but what is also true is that the government could, and would, end this "grand experiment into limited capitalism" if it threatened the existence of the state society. Most people, as you point out, have a limited understanding of economics and all too often use the word "communism" as a synonym for a dictatorship, in other words, when most people use the word communism to describe a society it usually relates to how much control is in the hands of a few rather than the economic aspects of the model.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    They call themselves Communist BUT.

    Source(s): 想改善經痛C~ NRA STAND AND FIGHT TYRANNY.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    well a guy just told me that Arizona sucks

    so I ask him

    are you ever been in Arizona?

    he say no

    it's basically the same thing for all idiots who say stuff about China

    they just don't know wtf they're talking about

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    ****

  • 7 years ago

    IT's because of tha GEEEEEEEE OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH PEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!! And all the smarmy political people who use smarmy political phrases

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.