Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Republicans, do you think your outlooks correlate with judging a person's worth by how much money they have? ?

I've noticed that a lot of Republican's thought processes correlate with how much money a person has: If they have more money, they made better decisions in life; if they need money, they are lazy bums who didn't work hard. There are a lot of correlations with the Republican party's party-line messages and love of money. How do they differentiate their pursuit of wealth and outlooks towards the poor with abhorring a love of money, which is the root of all evil? 

I constantly run into dialog that correlates a lack of wealth with a person's worth; do they not notice this as a party? Whenever they are against helping people, they use derogatory language like they are stealing their money and wanting "handouts", while they are hardworking people who deserve what they have. They derogatorily talk about the poor and how they made bad choices they need to live with since they lack wealth, but they made excellent choices since they have it. If you work at a low-income job, they call you lazy, or you would have a job that pays more money. 

The linking attribute is "more money makes you a better person" in their psychology. Do they realize they are doing this or rationalize it away with justifications and alternate perspectives?

Take Care, With Love Through God and Jesus and The Holy Ghost, 

Update:

How is it "kindness" to judge people based on their financial worth? Before the rioting, destruction excuse, why did Republicans treat people poorly based on their need for money? Do Republicans consider their money leverage to use against people in society and to gain power, protege?

I lean Democrat and don't support the riots and violence; a lot of Democrats don't.   

2 Answers

Relevance
  • J P
    Lv 4
    7 months ago

    Republican distain for the poor is a fact. When I was small, my parents come home from church and had a nice dinner and then they'd take us to the park. They taught me to be kind to everyone. Their president was Eisenhower, who felt a spiritual calling to show mercy and strive for equality, defend the disenfranchised, and tax the super-wealthy. But they turned into Goldwater Republicans. Their sociopolitical philosophy changed; they equated money with all things good. For many years I rejected their faith because of them, then found faith without them. You correctly attribute their attitude to what another question posed as "plutocracy." Money rules them to the point that they wield it as a weapon and shield. They tout their success and disrespect the poor except when they "put on" charity as a ruse to boost ego.  We know what Christ said about love of money and the importance of anonymous good deeds. The new ethic violates the foundations of American decency.

  • Anonymous
    7 months ago

    We dont share our kindness and money with people who are for rioting, murder, destruction of property,  the democrats and liberals who support that kind of behavior should be removed from society 

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.