Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Science & MathematicsAlternativeOther - Alternative · 4 months ago

Why would anyone ask a question in the Paranormal section then and block anyone that could answer it?

Update:

A consensus, how so? Is there a Yahoo Psychology?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    When a question is not an actual question at all but a rabid rant full of lies and bulldust of course you do not want to give anyone the opportunity to point out that all you have produced is a torrent of codswallop. 

    Maybe EG thinks that if he spews enough libellous nonsense we will forget how Josephette Maria tricked him into emailing her all his secrets :D 

    Mental Health might be a better category than Psychology since we are dealing with a clearly abnormal individual. 

  • Anonymous
    3 months ago

    How do you know who could answer it? It also depends on what the question is. If it is about paedophilia, I would immediately unblock you, oops, sorry, I meant I would immediately unblock Statturete of Liberty. As you can see here, she would even cheat when playing solitaire.

    She has answered your question twice as penal colourist. And to top it off she is also asking this question and giving herself the best answer. That is the person who is also lying about her offences on here. She was also thrown off here for that offence and her account closed permanently losing all her points. 

    She cheated until she had 10 times more best answer points than all of the top ten of us all together. Yet strangely enough, her input to this site is zero. She knows fine well what she did. Did nobody notice how she even wrote a comment a few days ago bluffing that she cared about the children on here and made a point of saying "there are no kids on here under thirteen? Strange enough, the kid she was asking about her vagina and if she used a vibrator actually said she was 11 on her post. The next kid said she was having a 12th birthday party but her dad had died the week before. The child said she felt a touch on her arm and asked if it could be her dad saying happy birthday. This bastard said "no, it isn't, he's dead" The next kid was a fifteen year old trying to get a bit of comfort because he just lost his mum. The paedo gave a sarky comment to him but he gave her one back and because of that she said "I'm glad your mother died Hehehe! That behaviour is a far cry from bluffing she worries about the children. She admits she trolls and even said she enjoys the comradery. If anyone writes in to the new address for this site they will be able to get details about her behaviour as it is also against the law to treat children like that not to mention the paedo questions. She was booted off because I shopped her but only for a couple of months. She should have been handed over to the law. At one point, she offered to open her account so I could see she had not been messing with kids and it was clear. Unfortunately, an eagle-eyed user spotted that she deleted 28 of her comments first. Anyone who believes this evil bich need simply to write to Yahoo and because of the seriousness of these offences, they will prove it for you as it may have been your child. The offences I know about were done using her Furious Unicorn account. Even now, if I caught her talking to any of my kids, I would be on a plane to her address for a nice cup of tea.

  • 4 months ago

    Because he only likes to get answers from his 'special needs' buddy, Pearl.. 

  • Dr. NG
    Lv 7
    4 months ago

    My guess is they don't want to take a chance on being exposed as a fool again. Not that it does any good, the jackass left the paddock long ago.

  • 4 months ago

    Some individuals are pretty messed up in the head, and that one is a member of the messed-up group, would be my explanation.  They want the attention but don't want the responsibility.

  • 4 months ago

    A question was raised here about the usefulness of personal attacks. The consensus was that they are not relevant to science. Please ask your question at Yahoo Psychology. EDIT - Look at very recent Alternative answers, where my answer got 6 thumbs-up votes. Look under Social Sciences for Psychology.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.