True Or False: 2003 Was The Absolute PEAK Of NASCAR?

NASCAR SUCKS....all the tracks are the same design, cars  are all the same,  do not look like factory cars ,not enough short track racing and that why i dont watch them, ASA/CRA races are a lot better and faster, when ever Nascar guys come and race them they allways get caught cheating

False!

I do not see why 2003 was chosen! The loss of Winston for the series hardly seems worthy of suggesting that year.NASCAR used to be a bunch of moonshine runners strutting their stuff. Then the manufactures got involved and rules had to be written to keep the sport competitive.I would have to suggest 1993 because the cars no longer had any "factory sheet metal".Remember NASCAR means National Stock Car Racing! 1993 was the last year the body could be considered stock! But it could also be argued that 1966 was the last year NASCAR actually had a stock car on the track. After that the chassis had to be built to fit stock bodies because of uni-body construction and safety issues in a crash.So any way,  my nomination is 1993 because there is no way cars on the track after that could be considered "Stock"!https://www.nascar.com/gallery/the-evolution-of-na...

The peak was the late 60's. Sports turned into to corporate money making ventures intrests me none. Real people playing ball, racing; good stuff. Look up some nascar from the 60's, your heart will race. People trying to win instead of feed the corp.

probably .. by 06 or 8 or so i had become disenchanted with the fake pre-arrqanged pileups on the last lap they continually stage ... nascar is a corporate advertising joke these days .. inaccessible to the common guy, which is what stock car racing should be all about ..